From: "Steve Doiel" <nospam_steved@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Library Level Question
Date: 1999/02/15
Date: 1999-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36c8d860.0@news.pacifier.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m3lnhztu9w.fsf@mheaney.ni.net
>But if we have a package inside another, like this:
>
>package Book is
>
> package Diagram is
>
> ...
> end Diagram;
>
>...
>end Book;
>
>
>then the inner package is _not_ at library level. The diagram is in the
>book, not the library.
>
Thank you, I believe the concept of library level is clear to me now.
If I understand correctly, your example is in slight error in that package
Diagram is at the library level, but its contents are not.
SteveD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-15 0:00 Library Level Question Steve Doiel
1999-02-15 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Steve Doiel [this message]
1999-02-15 0:00 ` kirk
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Steve Doiel
1999-02-23 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-03-08 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox