From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: Conversion of Access Types Question
Date: 1999/01/21
Date: 1999-01-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36a78574.1068169@news.pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 787d25$hq5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
>Indeed, I agree. Meanwhile, it is not a bad idea at all
>to routinely use ALL,
I disagree. There are significant differences between things
allocated on the heap with 'new' and things on the stack or fixed that
use 'all'. Certainly something like a generic library routine might
want to be able to handle either kind, but, in my code at least, it's
very rare that the two are actually mixed.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-01-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-14 0:00 Conversion of Access Types Question Paul S. Heidmann
1999-01-14 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Paul S. Heidmann
1999-01-14 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-01-15 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-20 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-01-20 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-01-20 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-01-21 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-27 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-01-28 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-21 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-21 0:00 ` Tom Moran [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox