From: Andreas Winckler <andreas.winckler@frqnet.de>
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.11 worth installing
Date: 1999/03/04
Date: 1999-03-04T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36DE4874.9FA45B71@frqnet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 36DDC9B2.7FC0B5C6@hiwaay.net
Bruce or Tracy schrieb:
>
> Is GNAT 3.11 far enough better than 3.10 that it is worth installing?
We used GNAT 3.11 on a Sun Sparc 5 to compile our software for X.25
communication. The software uses very intensive the Ada tasking and
exception handling features. With GNAT 3.11 the software crashes
uncontrolled with a segmentation fault (core dump).
Don't know if this example applies to you, it's just our experience.
AW
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andreas Winckler Tel: (+49) (7541) 282 - 462
Department: MHS Fax: (+49) (7541) 282 - 299
FREQUENTIS Network Systems GmbH http://www.frqnet.de
------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-04 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-03 0:00 GNAT 3.11 worth installing Bruce or Tracy
1999-03-03 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-03-03 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-03-04 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler [this message]
1999-03-04 0:00 ` dennison
1999-03-05 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-03-05 0:00 ` dennison
1999-03-06 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner
1999-03-08 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-03-09 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1999-03-05 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-04 0:00 ` dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox