From: "Samuel T. Harris" <sam_harris@hso.link.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.11 worth installing
Date: 1999/03/03
Date: 1999-03-03T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36DDD7E0.65C50606@hso.link.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 36DDC9B2.7FC0B5C6@hiwaay.net
Bruce or Tracy wrote:
>
> Is GNAT 3.11 far enough better than 3.10 that it is worth installing?
>
> Does it come with its own debugger, or will it use bdb 3.10?
>
> Is FNAT 3.11 compatible with FnatGraphicsPackage04?
>
> Bruce
I am a HUGE ASIS for Ada83 fan and am well-pleased with the 3.11p
compiler and its corresponding ASIS implementation. Now I can
finally start exploring the additions to ASIS to support Ada95.
--
Samuel T. Harris, Principal Engineer
Raytheon, Scientific and Technical Systems
"If you can make it, We can fake it!"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-03 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-03 0:00 GNAT 3.11 worth installing Bruce or Tracy
1999-03-03 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-03-03 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris [this message]
1999-03-04 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-03-04 0:00 ` dewar
1999-03-04 0:00 ` dennison
1999-03-05 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-03-05 0:00 ` dennison
1999-03-06 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner
1999-03-08 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-03-09 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1999-03-05 0:00 ` robert_dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox