From: "Hubert B. Keller" <keller@iai.fzk.de>
Subject: Re: Ada or C++ acting 'correctly' here?
Date: 1999/03/01
Date: 1999-03-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36DAF21B.3BD38C9B@iai.fzk.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: hcaC2.5$r83.102@news12.ispnews.com
William McKenzie wrote:
> With -W3, always a good idea, microsoft will give you an 'integral constant
> overflow' message on the expression. With -WX -W3 you could even say it
> behaves as well as the ADA compiler.
>
Is it a question of defined semantics of programming language constructs or
more
a question of compiler statements and how can i decide how a program was
compiled and behaves using it later as an existing module (and searching for
errors)?
I believe it should be a question of clearly defined semantics - so i'm using
Ada.
H. Keller
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-27 0:00 Ada or C++ acting 'correctly' here? bill
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Steve Doiel
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
[not found] ` <36e8e201.48455851@netnews.worldnet.att.net>
1999-03-18 0:00 ` bglbv
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Claudius Proculus
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Biju Thomas
1999-02-28 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-28 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-03-01 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Gautier.DeMontmollin
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-28 0:00 ` William McKenzie
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Hubert B. Keller [this message]
1999-03-01 0:00 ` fraser
1999-02-28 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-02 0:00 ` Willliam V
1999-03-02 0:00 ` SpamSpamSpam
1999-03-02 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-02 0:00 ` Gautier.DeMontmollin
1999-03-02 0:00 ` kvisko
1999-03-02 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox