From: Steve Quinlan <steven.quinlan@lmco.com>
Subject: A Modest Defense of ACT (though they are big boys and can take care of themselves)
Date: 1999/02/20
Date: 1999-02-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36CF00DB.43DF428C@lmco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7ah65p$4ag$1@remarQ.com
I think it's quite amazing how some people seem to feel that because GNAT is
free, they can insist that ACT add or develop feature x, y or z, because "the
users want it". (ACT probably knows best what GNAT users want -- God knows they
probably have more direct contact with Ada programmers than any other company).
Such people then procede to get mightily and indignantly upset if the response
isn't a nurturing electronic hug and immediate acquiescence to their
suggestions, along with a promised release date!
As a paying customer of ACT (well, I work for a paying customer) I find they are
very responsive. But the free version is a side benefit. They probably, and
rightly, extend and enhance GNAT to provide what their paying customers need.
They just did so for us for a specific feature we wanted. The rest of the
world benefits when that stuff becomes public.
I believe ACT is happy to listen to suggestions from anyone. Make your
suggestions, make your case to them why it would be valuable, try to enlist
others to your side to support that. ACT will consider it, in the context of
their business needs. But they make the final decision about whether to expend
their finite resources on work which their paying customers may not be
clamoring for. And no one really has much standing to beat them up for it. How
many other companies are giving you free Ada compilers? How many other compiler
company presidents are here every day helping out answering questions, etc. If
he didn't care about Ada and its users, he wouldn't spend so much time here
answering our stupid questions, or correcting our stupid answers to other
people's intelligent questions (OK, they're not all stupid -- a bit of
rhetorical hyperbole there.)
Steve Quinlan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-14 0:00 Fixed point multiplication ambiguity Marc A. Criley
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-01-14 0:00 ` bob
1999-01-14 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-01-15 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-28 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-01-28 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-28 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-01-28 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-29 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-01-29 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-01-29 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-01-29 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-01 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-02 0:00 ` Building a compiler (was: Fixed point multiplication ambiguity) Nick Roberts
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1999-02-04 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-04 0:00 ` Garbage collection - was " news.oxy.com
1999-02-04 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-05 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-02-05 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-02-18 0:00 ` news.oxy.com
1999-02-18 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-18 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-02-18 0:00 ` AdaHag
1999-02-18 0:00 ` Garbage collection - was Re: Building a compiler Samuel Mize
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Garbage collection - was Re: Building a compiler (was: Fixed point multiplication ambiguity) Steven Hovater
1999-02-20 0:00 ` Steve Quinlan [this message]
1999-02-21 0:00 ` A Modest Defense of ACT (though they are big boys and can take care of themselves) dewar
1999-02-22 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-21 0:00 ` bill
1999-02-22 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-02-22 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-22 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-24 0:00 ` Steve Quinlan
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-26 0:00 ` Steve Quinlan
1999-02-26 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Dave Taylor
1999-02-28 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` Steve Quinlan
1999-02-25 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-05 0:00 ` GC+HC for GNAT/GCC (was: Building a compiler) Nick Roberts
[not found] ` <m33e4jvs1n.fsf@muc.de>
1999-02-06 0:00 ` GC+FSD for GNAT/GCC Nick Roberts
1999-02-07 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-05 0:00 ` Building a compiler Nick Roberts
1999-02-05 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-06 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Building a compiler (was: Fixed point multiplication ambiguity) dennison
1999-01-30 0:00 ` Fixed point multiplication ambiguity robert_dewar
1999-02-02 0:00 ` Building a compiler (was: Fixed point multiplication ambiguity) Nick Roberts
1999-02-03 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Fixed point multiplication ambiguity Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox