From: Steve Quinlan <steven.quinlan@lmco.com>
Subject: Re: accesibility level problem
Date: 1999/02/20
Date: 1999-02-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36CEEDCC.80E021D2@lmco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7alc7m$uo2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> So we replaced the original message by one that indicates
> the underlying rationale, and since we made that change,
> we have had no more questions about this error message!
>
I didn't notice it at first, but I think Thomas got that error message as
well, since he mentions that compiling with 3.11p just "changed the error
message", though he didn't give the contents of that message. So, here's a
case where he got the new, kinder, gentler GNAT message, and he DID still
have a question, and wanted to be directed to the relevant RM sections,
hard to understand though they may be.
So, change your statistics on this one -- since the change, you have gotten
at least ONE question on it! (couldn't resist that one, Robert).
Steve Quinlan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-19 0:00 accesibility level problem Thomas Handler
1999-02-19 0:00 ` steve quinlan
1999-02-20 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-20 0:00 ` Steve Quinlan [this message]
1999-02-21 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-03-02 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
1999-02-21 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
1999-02-21 0:00 ` Steve Quinlan
1999-02-22 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-22 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-22 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox