* I received this message:
@ 1999-01-18 0:00 alexs
1999-01-20 0:00 ` do Ada users eat enough bran? (was Re: I received this message:) Grant Griffin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: alexs @ 1999-01-18 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Return-Path: <dewar@gnat.com>
Received: from nile.gnat.com (NILE.GNAT.COM [205.232.38.5]) by
krim.seanet.com (8.8.7/SMI-SVR4)
with SMTP id SAA11677 for <alexs@seanet.com>; Sun, 17 Jan
1999 18:21:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gnat.com (TRENT.GNAT.COM) by nile.gnat.com (5.0/1.20)
id AA11909; Sun, 17 Jan 99 21:20:20 EST
Message-Id: <36A29A63.6DDBE2F1@gnat.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 21:20:19 -0500
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (OS/2; I)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: alexs@seanet.com
Subject: Tisdale
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UIDL: e14c1a8b6ee78f4a6735d3bd43fec999
Please do not pollute comp.lang.ada with Tisdale nonsense,
either pro or con.
On comp.lang.ada (apprently unlike comp.dsp), we expect
all messages to be
tecnically relevant to ada, and will not put up with this
kind of nonsense.
Thank you!
------------------------------------------------------
So this is a public apology to the netizens of
comp.lang.ada for my not checking the crossposting
status of an irrelevant thread. The spread of
Tisdale must be contained!!
Cheers,
---------------
Alexander Stoll
alexs@seanet.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* do Ada users eat enough bran? (was Re: I received this message:)
1999-01-18 0:00 I received this message: alexs
@ 1999-01-20 0:00 ` Grant Griffin
1999-01-22 0:00 ` do Ada users eat enough bran? Nick Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Grant Griffin @ 1999-01-20 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
alexs wrote:
>
[snip - Robert Dewar's e-mail header]
> To: alexs@seanet.com
> Subject: Tisdale
>
> Please do not pollute comp.lang.ada with Tisdale nonsense,
> either pro or con.
> On comp.lang.ada (apprently unlike comp.dsp), we expect
> all messages to be
> tecnically relevant to ada, and will not put up with this
> kind of nonsense.
> Thank you!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> So this is a public apology to the netizens of
> comp.lang.ada for my not checking the crossposting
> status of an irrelevant thread. The spread of
> Tisdale must be contained!!
Dear Ada-ites:
Robert Dewar also got on my case for this (since I had started it
all)[1]. I didn't realize you people take yourselves so seriously.
Therefore, please accept my apology as well.
Also, please forgive THIS message, which clearly is not technically
relevant to Ada[2].
=g2
[1] In Robert, you guys have appointed a very effective policeman[2].
[2] It's just a joke, Robert -- c'mon, let's have a little fun with it!
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Grant R. Griffin grant.griffin@iowegian.com
Iowegian International Corporation http://www.iowegian.com
_____________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-01-22 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-01-18 0:00 I received this message: alexs
1999-01-20 0:00 ` do Ada users eat enough bran? (was Re: I received this message:) Grant Griffin
1999-01-22 0:00 ` do Ada users eat enough bran? Nick Roberts
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox