From: David Gillon <David.Gillon@gecm.com>
Subject: Re: Future of Ada?
Date: 1999/01/13
Date: 1999-01-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <369C6E84.B7AD1B8B@gecm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 369c6b78.7488219@news.nodak.edu
Jim wrote:
> I've heard a lot of talk that Ada is kind of
> dying out and that not even the military is using it any more.
Has anyone spouting that kind of talk actually asked the military? I can
assure you there are plenty of military programs using Ada out there.
There's still no more appropriate language for safety critical or
mission critical apps, IMO.
--
David Gillon
MAv Rochester
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-01-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-13 0:00 Future of Ada? Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` David Gillon [this message]
1999-01-13 0:00 ` E. Robert Tisdale
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jeff Schweiger
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` dennison
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
[not found] ` <m3iuebji2a.fsf@fred.muc.de>
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Status of GNAT 3.11p Markus Kuhn
1999-01-15 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-15 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-16 0:00 ` Future of Ada? Kevin
1999-01-18 0:00 ` news.oxy.com
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Rush Kester
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Kirk
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Paul Whittington
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox