From: Egil H H <ehh.public@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Type invariants and private extensions?
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2017-09-11T13:00:03-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <364ff8e0-c7dd-4980-b19f-5d438edd8353@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op6pfu$h8h$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 9:51:35 PM UTC+2, Victor Porton wrote:
> As far as I understand, type invariants cannot be applied to types with
> private extensions. Right?
>
> It would be nice to create private extension types which would allow to use
> them only when certain boolean function on the parent type returns True.
>
> Is anything like this possible?
>
You can already do
type Foo is tagged private
with Type_Invariant'Class => Bar(Foo);
The Invariant will then be inherited by all derived types
--
~egilhh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-11 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-11 19:51 Type invariants and private extensions? Victor Porton
2017-09-11 20:00 ` Egil H H [this message]
2017-09-11 20:48 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-11 21:19 ` Egil H H
2017-09-11 21:27 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-11 21:49 ` Egil H H
2017-09-11 22:00 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-11 22:06 ` Egil H H
2017-09-12 7:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-09-11 22:00 ` Jere
2017-09-11 22:02 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-12 18:26 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-09-12 18:54 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-12 19:56 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-09-12 20:08 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-12 22:34 ` Shark8
2017-09-12 22:59 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-13 4:21 ` Jere
2017-09-13 4:28 ` Jere
2017-09-13 4:34 ` Jere
2017-09-14 13:52 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-15 0:48 ` Jere
2017-09-16 14:22 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-14 7:28 ` Shark8
2017-09-14 13:56 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-14 13:58 ` Victor Porton
2017-09-11 22:48 ` Shark8
2017-10-02 23:16 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox