From: "Patrick D. Rogers" <u270k@gsde.hso.link.com>
Subject: Re: VME address mapping
Date: 1998/07/02
Date: 1998-07-02T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <359BB621.9D6ED02B@gsde.hso.link.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.899335192@merv
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> Patrick said
>
> <<I'm puzzled as to how this satisfies RM 13.8(3):
>
> A code_statement is only allowed in the
> handled_sequence_of_statements
> of a subprogram_body. If a subprogram_body contains any
> code_statements,
> then within this subprogram_body the only allowed form of statement
> is
> a code_statement (labeled or not), the only allowed declarative_items
> are use_clauses, and no exception_handler is allowed (comments and
> pragmas are allowed as usual).
> >>
>
> The code that Sam quoted did not contain any code statements.
Ah, thanks. I missed the lack of the apostrophe, and thus that they
were not MCIs.
parent reply other threads:[~1998-07-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <dewar.899335192@merv>]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox