From: "Norman H. Cohen" <ncohen@watson.ibm.com>
To: John Volan <johnv@ac3i.dseg.ti.com>
Subject: Re: Hotspot. Dynamic compilers "better" than static one?
Date: 1998/06/05
Date: 1998-06-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35780CE5.1B6D@watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3576007B.FC0E0827@ac3i.dseg.ti.com
John Volan wrote:
> Norman H. Cohen wrote:
> >
> > (Translation into Java: Suppose there is a class T with method p and
> > final subclasses T1, T2, T3, .... If we know that most of the calls on
...
>
> Doesn't that presume that T1 is a "final" class (i.e., a leaf on the
> inheritance tree, with no further subclasses allowed)?
...
>
> If I'm missing something here, I'd be grateful for a clarification.
Yeah, you're missing the first word on the second quoted line from my
post! :-)
--
Norman H. Cohen
mailto:ncohen@watson.ibm.com
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/n/ncohen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-06-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6knj4m$odp$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
1998-05-30 0:00 ` Hotspot. Dynamic compilers "better" than static one? nabbasi
1998-05-30 0:00 ` Roedy Green
1998-05-30 0:00 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <dewar.896629645@merv>
1998-06-02 0:00 ` Dr Richard A. O'Keefe
1998-06-02 0:00 ` Lieven Marchand
1998-06-01 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1998-06-03 0:00 ` John Volan
1998-06-05 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen [this message]
1998-06-08 0:00 ` John Volan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox