Re: Ultimate Language feature list

[John Volan <johnv@ac3i.dseg.ti.com>]

Stephen Bull wrote:
> 
> Chris Miller wrote:
> 
> > I always understood that the "ultimate" language was, by
> > definition, an
> > interpreter for the English language !.
> >
> 
> Ugh! I hope this was not a serious suggestion: natural language
> is far too ambiguous to be a useful implementation language.

Indeed, as has been proven in any number of cautionary tales involving
genies-in-a-bottle and magic wishes.  What comes to mind is a fantasy
short story of recent years (can't remember the title or author) in
which a well-meaning but fatally tongue-tied protagonist attempted to
resolve all human conflict but instead unleashed a world-wide ecological
disaster by uttering the fateful words:

        "Let there be pease on earth."

At which point the porridge rains began... :-)

-- 
Signature volanSignature = 
  new Signature
  ( /*name:      */ "John G. Volan",
    /*employer:  */ "Raytheon Advanced C3I Systems, San Jose",
    /*workEmail: */ "johnv@ac3i.dseg.ti.com",
    /*homeEmail: */ "johnvolan@sprintmail.com",
    /*selfPlug:  */ "Sun Certified Java Programmer",
    /*twoCents:  */ "Java would be even cooler with Ada95's " +
                    "generics, enumerated types, function types, " +
                    "named parameter passing, etc...",
    /*disclaimer:*/ "These views not packaged in COM.ti.dseg.ac3i, " +
                    "so loading them throws DontQuoteMeError. :-)" );