comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: OO and large packages
Date: 1998/04/23
Date: 1998-04-23T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <353f7983.1926480@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net> (raw)


Is there a good methodology to break up a complex object into multiple
smaller packages?
  In a windowing system I have a "window" object with a great many
functions for both input and output, some of which are rather complex.
One possible split is 
  type output_window is new basic_window ...
and a package providing just the output functions, then another
package with
  type input_window is new output_window ...
overiding the input functions of basic window (which weren't even
mentioned in input_window).  That produces two, smaller, package, but
output_window is secretly passing all the input functions from
basic_window on to input_window, which seems a really poor idea.
  The only other obvious breakup is to include everything in one large

  type io_window is new basic_window ...
but move the guts of the larger functions off to separate packages in
a traditional bottom-up way, with no special conceptual structure.
  Suggestions?




             reply	other threads:[~1998-04-23  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-04-23  0:00 Tom Moran [this message]
1998-04-23  0:00 ` OO and large packages Simon Wright
1998-04-24  0:00 ` Joseph Wisniewski
1998-04-24  0:00 ` Tom Moran
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox