From: Dennis Reimer <dreimer@slb.isd.csc.com>
Subject: Re: Standadised OO Language
Date: 1998/02/15
Date: 1998-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34E761BB.139E@slb.isd.csc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 34E2D3D9.B2F1F398@adelaide.on.net
Matthew Daniel wrote:
>
> After Having a "discussion" with one of the engineers at work, he is an
> Ada "hater" and I am the Ada "lover", about standadised OO languages, I
> said Ada95 was the only one, well at least 6 months ago, he said C++ has
> an ANSI standard and has for a couple of years.
>
> I was just wondering if I was correct or totally wrong.
>
> Thanks
>
> Matt
ANSI C has been around for a while but I believe ANSI C++ was ratified
only recently (about 3 months ago.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-02-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-02-12 0:00 Standadised OO Language Matthew Daniel
1998-02-12 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1998-02-13 0:00 ` Howard W. LUDWIG
1998-02-13 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1998-02-13 0:00 ` William Clodius
1998-02-13 0:00 ` Kenneth W. Sodemann
1998-02-12 0:00 ` Mark Bennison
1998-02-12 0:00 ` Standardized " Markus Kuhn
1998-02-13 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1998-02-13 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1998-02-17 0:00 ` Terry Devine
1998-02-12 0:00 ` Standadised " Kenneth W. Sodemann
1998-02-12 0:00 ` David Weller
1998-02-12 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1998-02-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-02-15 0:00 ` Dennis Reimer [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-02-14 0:00 Marc Wachowitz
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox