comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Appleby <jappleby@arlington.net>
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.10p and GCC 2.7.2.3
Date: 1998/02/08
Date: 1998-02-08T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34DDED2F.7AF4@arlington.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6bguq9$rjh$2@uuneo.neosoft.com


Robert B. Love wrote:
> 
> I've just upgraded my Linux to RedHat 5 and seem to have lost my
> ability to compile.  I believe that my gcc got upgraded to 2.7.2.3.
> What gcc was gnat-3.10p built with?  Is there a compatibility problem
> with it and the newer gcc?
> 
> All assistance appreciated.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>  Bob Love                                   MIME & NeXT Mail OK
>  rlove@neosoft.com                            PGP key available
> ----------------------------------------------------------------

Let me add to this thought, ...

Overloading of basic arithmetic operators (+,-,>,<,mod,rem ...) which
worked in GNAT Ada 3.07 and 3.09 doesn't work in 3.10.  The compiler
complained that it couldn't resolve ambiguous references for these
operators between our file and 'System' even though the low level math
operations were fully resolved within the boundaries of the file being
compiled.  Unfortunately, we have to overload the operators because of
the peculiarities of the target machine (custom-built, embedded
application).  It's also a shame because v3.10's development environment
looks really slick.

Otherwise, well done GNAT.

-=Michael Appleby=-




  parent reply	other threads:[~1998-02-08  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-02-07  0:00 GNAT 3.10p and GCC 2.7.2.3 Robert B. Love 
1998-02-07  0:00 ` Jean-Francois Vilarem
1998-02-10  0:00   ` Robert B. Love 
1998-02-08  0:00 ` Michael Appleby [this message]
1998-02-08  0:00   ` bklungle
1998-02-09  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox