* Re: Strip vs. DLL
[not found] <34D6B16E.281C1437@srv.net>
@ 1998-02-05 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Stephen Leake @ 1998-02-05 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Paul Whittington wrote:
>
> Having finally figured out how to build a DLL using GNAT 3.10p1
> I now have a new problem.
>
> When I run strip on a DLL that works fine it seems to remove the
> exported routine names along with all the debug information. No
> matter what strip switches I use this happens.
>
> Is there a way to strip a DLL without also stripping the ability to
> use exported routines by name?
I don't have a direct answer, but if the purpose of using 'strip' is to
remove debugging information, you could always recompile without -g.
This is one reason to have a "release build" as well as a "debug build"
makefile.
>
> --
> Paul Whittington
> Whittington Engineering
> 260 South Woodruff Avenue
> Suite 201
> Idaho Falls, ID 83401
> paul@srv.net
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Name: smime.p7s
> Part 1.2 Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
> Encoding: base64
> Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
- Stephe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1998-02-05 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <34D6B16E.281C1437@srv.net>
1998-02-05 0:00 ` Strip vs. DLL Stephen Leake
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox