From: Wes Groleau <wwgrol@gc057.fw.hac.com>
Subject: Two more AQS-95 questions
Date: 1998/02/02
Date: 1998-02-02T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34D60055.1FFF@gc057.fw.hac.com> (raw)
1) In 3.2.6, why "use a constant ... when the value must be static"
but "named numbers, ... whenever possible." Isn't a named number
static? Is there an advantage to a (typed) constant for
"staticness" ?
2. (Re: end of preface) the first comment address bounced.
I'm CC'ing this to the other listed address, but if that
bounces, can someone from AJPO or SPC provide an alternative?
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Wes Groleau, Raytheon Systems Company, Fort Wayne, IN USA
Member of Technical Staff - AFATDS Tool-smith Wanna-be
wwgrol AT pseserv3.fw.hac.com
Don't send advertisements to this domain unless asked!
All disk space on fw.hac.com hosts belongs to either
Raytheon Systems Company or the United States government.
Using email to store YOUR advertising on them is trespassing!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~1998-02-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-02-02 0:00 Wes Groleau [this message]
1998-02-03 0:00 ` Two more AQS-95 questions Robert Dewar
1998-02-05 0:00 ` K. E. Garlington
1998-02-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox