Re: GNAT Limitations?

[Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov>]

wanker@exploited.barmy.army wrote:
> >2. Remove Ada.
> 
> The manual told me to use Ada.  So should I do (1) then ignore
> what it says?  After all I can't heed 1 & 2 at the same time.

2. with Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation;

For compatibility with Ada 83, "Unchecked_Deallocation" is declared both
in Standard (as a rename) and in Ada. To use the one in Ada, you need to
with it correctly.

> 
> If the LRM says one thing and GNAT is supposed to be a conforming
> Ada compiler, then it is a natural assumption to think that it
> would follow the Manual (or have the rules for reading manuals
> changed?).

GNAT is correct, and so is the manual. Keep asking questions; you'll
eventually get where you need to be :).

-- 
- Stephe