From: Thornton <thornton@AVICOM.NET>
Subject: Re: ROBERT DEWER, Chill out...
Date: 1998/01/23
Date: 1998-01-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34C88745.CEDE4773@avicom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.885451526@merv
Robert,
There's no doubt you're highly educated & intelligent in regards to the
topics discussed on this newsgroups, but I second the motion that you're
also quite rude.
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> <<It's nothing you did. It's Professor Dewar's attitude. It seems that
> he considers this newsgroup to be his personal fiefdom and if someone
> does something that gets in his way, his habit is to send them rude,
> pompous e-mails (please note the plural). >>
>
> Just so people know, I have indeed been sending emails to people who have
> almost certainly been cross-posting on the troll posts to CLA without
> realizing it. 99% of the time I get a polite reply saying something
> like "oops, sorry, I did not realize this was cross-posted", but I
> guess Charles is in the 1% (he also did not realize he was cross-posting,
> but takes the attitude that he is entitled to, which is of course true,
> anyone can say anything).
>
> Actually I am quite surprised that so many people react positively to
> such messages, and it definitely helps keep accidental noise down. You
> can't tell people what do do, and you will always get some noisy minority
> who wlil post no matter what, but it helps quite a bit if the reasonable
> majority takes a little bit more care not to accidentally post.
>
> These cross-posted trolls come and go of course, but it sure seems like
> CLA has been beset with them recently, and once again the noise-to-signal
> ratio is getting a bit high.
>
> (I guess Charles is a bit frustrated, he threatened to complain to me
> to my employers at Ada Core Technologies :-) :-)
>
> Well at least we get some signal, I am happy to finally get at least
> ONE reply (from Stephe) on how to handle that interesting error message
>
> <<When you point out to this arrogant, conceited pillock that you don't
> appreciate unsolicited e-mails and will happily take the argument
> further, he then sends another stream of personal insults, finishing
> with an announcement that he has put you on his mailer rejection list.>>
>
> P.S. If anyone wants to know how to get on my mailer rejection list, it's
> an easy algorithm (in fact I could probably automate it!) If I get a message
> with obsenities or rude language, then you go on the list. It is not that
> this offends me, it is just that I take this as a signal that the
> probability of further intelligent discussion has dropped to zero :-)
>
> An entertaining thread title (should be DEWAR of course, but I don't
> want to disturb those who want to use their thread following mailers
> to follow this thread :-)
--
.---. .-----------
/ \ __ / ------
/ / \( )/ -----
////// ' \/ ` ---
//// / // : : ---
// / / /` '--
// //..\\
----UU----UU-----
'//||\\`
"Mind is the Master power that moulds and makes,
And Man is Mind, and evermore he takes
The tool of Thought, and, shaping what he wills,
Brings forth a thousand joys, a thousand ills;-
He thinks in secret, and it comes to pass:
Environment is but his looking-glass."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-01-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-01-14 0:00 ROBERT DEWER, Chill out Scott Barrish
1998-01-22 0:00 ` Charles F Hankel
[not found] ` <dewar.885449413@merv>
1998-01-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-01-23 0:00 ` Thornton [this message]
1998-01-23 0:00 ` Paul Van Bellinghen
1998-01-24 0:00 ` Scott Barrish
1998-01-24 0:00 ` James Hopper
1998-01-23 0:00 ` Adam Donahue
1998-01-23 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox