comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul H. Whittington" <paul@srv.net>
Subject: Re: About Ada...
Date: 1997/12/17
Date: 1997-12-17T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3498B3C8.432910F9@srv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 67a8a1$aro@mtinsc02.worldnet.att.net


John can you give any comparisons regarding development and
maintenance, in terms of cost and time to market, between Ada
and any alternatives that have been attempted?


John Apa wrote:

> I'm sure sorry if I threatened your belief system, but since I work for the
> company that does the work for most of Boeing's AC I think I can safely
> make that assertion. The 777, 737, 747-400, V-22, and CH-47 all run on a
> diet of Ada. New planes ship with Ada, and the retrofit market is mostly
> Ada also. The guis are c or VAPs. We have hundreds of Ada engineers working
> on Boeing, and even Airbus, products. So start believing.
>
> I'm currently developing under DO-178B (in Ada95 even!), the FAA's new
> standard for flight software. It's very daunting, but most new software has
> to be recertified anyway so having it in Ada isn't a big deal. Much of the
> earlier (pre-84) SW was written in PL/1 and was ported to Ada. No, not the
> best plan, but that's how we got to where we are. Much of the code has been
> redesigned since then in Ada.
>
> You sound like you're stating that it'd be harder to certify with Ada than
> anything else, that's just plain false. It also sounds like you're stating
> that planes are never upgraded to more recent flight management/control
> systems, wrong again. Airframes are around for quite a while and in this
> market at least they are upgraded to increase safety and efficiency. Both
> noble causes.
>
> The FAA and world authorities are coming out with new regs for flying and
> that means better avionics are required to keep everyone safe. Something I
> strongly believe in when I'm at 30K Feet.
>
> You could have checked these facts too, it's certainly not a secret. I
> posted this information informally to show that Ada is not just a military
> language. It is being accepted commercially where safety and reliability
> are critical.
>
> Please check your beliefs and repost.
> John Apa
>
> Arthur Evans Jr <evans@evans.pgh.pa.us> wrote in article
> <evans-1712970812050001@ppp21.s8.pgh.net>...
> > In article <677hcg$s04@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>,
> > "John Apa" <wy.hunter@mailexcite.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ada is used on almost every AC that Boeing delivers, not just the 777.
> >
> > Are you sure of this fact?  I find it highly unlikely.  Many aircraft
> > Boeing still delivers were developed long before Ada was considered a
> > practical solution -- or even before Ada existed.  As rewriting in Ada
> > would require new FAA certification, a daunting obstacle, I find it hard
> > to believe that anyone would have done such an upgrade.
> >
> > Please check your facts and repost.
> >
> > Art Evans
> >
> > Arthur Evans Jr, PhD
> > Ada Consulting
> > evans@evans.pgh.pa.us
> >







  reply	other threads:[~1997-12-17  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-11-30  0:00 About Ada Spiffy1two
1997-11-30  0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-12-17  0:00   ` John Apa
1997-12-17  0:00     ` Arthur Evans Jr
1997-12-18  0:00       ` John Apa
1997-12-17  0:00         ` Paul H. Whittington [this message]
1997-12-19  0:00           ` John Apa
1997-12-18  0:00     ` Peter Hermann
1997-12-19  0:00       ` Robert S. White
1997-12-20  0:00         ` Ralph Paul
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-18  5:49 Adrian Hoe
     [not found] <n08okn$pt4$2@dont-email.me>
2015-10-22 17:00 ` About ADA David Botton
2015-10-26 17:18 ` miloslav.raus
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox