From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <nospam@gsg.eds.com>
Subject: Re: More like *p versus p[0]
Date: 1997/12/02
Date: 1997-12-02T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34847265.3DD8@gsg.eds.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 65evej$cph$1@mer-news.ctron.com
vo@ctron.com wrote:
>
> If you really have a problem with using *p
> then you should use p[0]. Never, never
> underestimate C 's expressiveness.
Actually, that's another thing that I consider to be a serious defect in
C.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Senior Software SE
The values in from and reply-to are for the benefit of spammers:
reply to domain eds.com, user msustys1.smetz or to domain gsg.eds.com,
user smetz. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-12-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-11-25 0:00 More like *p versus p[0] vo
1997-12-02 0:00 ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz [this message]
[not found] ` <3486e4ff.2924140@news.thegrid.net>
1997-12-04 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-12-03 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-12-08 0:00 Marin David Condic, 561.796.8997, M/S 731-96
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox