From: Mats Weber <Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch>
To: Oliver.Kellogg@vs.dasa.de
Subject: Re: Design of the Ada95 object system
Date: 1997/11/28
Date: 1997-11-28T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <347EEE5C.565D8C65@elca-matrix.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 880451634.2136@dejanews.com
Oliver.Kellogg@vs.dasa.de wrote:
I agree with you. I would also have preferred package types for the Ada 95 OO
stuff. But there has already been much discussion on that subject in c.l.a.
> If anyone can refer me to further reading explaining the choice of
> object mechanism in Ada95, that'd be great. I've already consulted
> the Ada95 Rationale and found some comparisons with other languages
> at the end of chapter 4, but not a discussion of alternatives
> considered for the Ada95 object system during language design.
I did my PhD thesis on exactly that subject. It's on the Web at
<http://lglwww.epfl.ch/Team/MW/Ada-Extensions/Ada-Extensions.html>.
You can also retrieve past discussions on the subject with dejanews.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-11-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-11-25 0:00 Design of the Ada95 object system Oliver.Kellogg
1997-11-25 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-11-28 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1997-11-28 0:00 ` Mats Weber [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox