From: Tom Moran <tmoran@bix.com>
Subject: limited/non-limited in Ada95
Date: 1997/10/13
Date: 1997-10-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3442C2A3.3781@bix.com> (raw)
In Ada 83 there was always an argument against using 'limited' because
it would make anything anything using that type also limited. But in
Ada 95 with tagged types we have the same problem in reverse: if a
tagged type is non-limited then all its descendants are non-limited and
some important capabilities are only available to limited types. Has
anyone else found this to be a problem, and do you have any good
solutions?
next reply other threads:[~1997-10-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-10-13 0:00 Tom Moran [this message]
1997-10-16 0:00 ` limited/non-limited in Ada95 Matthew Heaney
1997-10-17 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-10-18 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-10-21 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-10-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-10-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-10-22 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-10-22 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-10-23 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1997-10-23 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-10-24 0:00 ` Geert Bosch
1997-10-23 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-10-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-10-21 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-10-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-10-22 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-10-18 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1997-10-18 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-10-19 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1997-10-19 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-10-21 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1997-10-21 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-10-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-10-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox