From: "Chris Sparks (Mr. Ada)" <mrada@CATALINA-INTER.NET>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 visibility question
Date: 1997/09/25
Date: 1997-09-25T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <342A7989.219C@catalina-inter.net> (raw)
Robert A Duff <bobduff@WORLD.STD.COM> wrote:
> >package body c.f is
> > procedure p(x:in out file_dialog) is
> > y:integer;
> > begin
> > y:=root(x).peek_a_boo;
> > y:=x.peek_a_boo; 1/3 of compilers tested complained
>
> This is illegal. Dialog has a peek_a_boo component implicitly declared
> in the private part of c.d. There is no place within the immediate
> scope of file_dialog where this private part is visible, so file_dialog
> doesn't declare peek_a_boo. (It's still there at run time, but you can
> only get at it by doing a type conversion, as shown above.)
Wouldn't peek_a_boo be visible since the types are part of the "c" (no
pun
intended) hierarchy?
Chris Sparks
next reply other threads:[~1997-09-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-09-25 0:00 Chris Sparks (Mr. Ada) [this message]
1997-09-25 0:00 ` Ada 95 visibility question Bruce Link
1997-09-25 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-09-26 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-09-20 0:00 Tom Moran
1997-09-22 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox