From: "Richard L. Johnson" <JOHNSON@halley.aero.org>
Subject: How good is GNAT?
Date: 1997/09/23
Date: 1997-09-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3427898A.50986455@halley.aero.org> (raw)
I recently posted this question to the GNAT chat group and someone
pointed out (probably rightfully so) that the readers may have a
"bias".
Now I ask the general Ada community. Any inputs would be appreciated:
Can someone give me some insight into the pros and cons of using GNAT
over other products? How stable is GNAT? What experiences have you had
getting support from ACT? What problems/limitations have you
encountered with the compiler? Would you use GNAT for a large
development? Any concerns using it with Sun Solaris on SparcStations?
Any information is welcome. Thank you in advance.
-------------------------
Rick Johnson
The Aerospace Corporation
email: johnson@aero.org
Phone: (310)336-3588
next reply other threads:[~1997-09-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-09-23 0:00 Richard L. Johnson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-10-01 0:00 How good is GNAT? Richard L. Johnson
1997-10-02 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox