comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dan13 <dan13@i.b.m.net>
Subject: Re: Is there an ADA analogue to the C++ continue statement?
Date: 1997/09/20
Date: 1997-09-20T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3423AF1B.5152@i.b.m.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3422F037.41CA@lmco.com


William Dale Jr wrote:
[SNIP]
> 
> > Why silly? Well to me, most absolute rules are a mistake, since there are
> > almost always exceptions. Note that I avoid the mistake of phrasing this
> > particular rule in absolute terms :-)
> >
> > Robert
> 
> OK, but if you work on my project  -- NO GOTO's.

 I'll bet you also think that there's a magic number which
represents the maximum allowable lines-of-code in a procedure.

 Any coding standard, or project commandment, or mindset, which
bars usage of GOTO *unconditionally* ... is ABSOLUTELY silly.
Yes, GOTO is to be avoided (as a goal), no sane person argues
this. Yet there are times when using a GOTO enhances the
readability - and thus the maintainability - of the code.

 Coding standards etc... should be thought of as *guidelines*;
with "violations" of the guidelines being vetted by some project
specific process.

> 
> [I'd suspect a troll for flames was going on here but I have great
>  respect for Roberts' previous posts ]
>

 Didn't sound at all like a troll here :)
 


                                             imho

                                                 dan13




  parent reply	other threads:[~1997-09-20  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-09-17  0:00 Is there an ADA analogue to the C++ continue statement? Heath, Terry D.
1997-09-18  0:00 ` Pascal Obry
1997-09-18  0:00   ` Robert A Duff
1997-09-18  0:00   ` Samuel Tardieu
1997-09-19  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
     [not found]     ` <3422F037.41CA@lmco.com>
1997-09-20  0:00       ` dan13 [this message]
1997-09-21  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
     [not found]           ` <3426B51E.7296@lmco.com>
1997-09-22  0:00             ` Coding Standards & GOTO Matthew Heaney
1997-09-23  0:00               ` Mark A Biggar
1997-09-24  0:00                 ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
1997-09-24  0:00                 ` W. Wesley Groleau x4923
1997-09-24  0:00               ` Aaron Quantz
1997-09-26  0:00               ` Charles H. Sampson
1997-09-23  0:00             ` Coding Standards W. Wesley Groleau x4923
1997-09-23  0:00             ` Coding Standards & GOTO Charles Rose
1997-09-24  0:00               ` Matthew Heaney
1997-09-25  0:00                 ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
1997-09-22  0:00         ` Is there an ADA analogue to the C++ continue statement? Richard D Riehle
1997-09-23  0:00         ` GOTO considered Satanic (was: Is there an ADA analogue to the C++ continue statement?) Adam Beneschan
1997-09-24  0:00           ` Brian Rogoff
1997-09-25  0:00             ` Larry Kilgallen
1997-09-26  0:00             ` Matthew Heaney
1997-09-26  0:00               ` Brian Rogoff
1997-10-07  0:00               ` Robert I. Eachus
1997-09-24  0:00           ` W. Wesley Groleau x4923
1997-09-25  0:00           ` Alan Brain
1997-09-25  0:00             ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
1997-09-22  0:00     ` Is there an ADA analogue to the C++ continue statement? Richard A. O'Keefe
1997-09-29  0:00     ` John G. Volan
1997-09-18  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox