* Re: Adjust bug?
1997-07-18 0:00 Adjust bug? Tom Moran
@ 1997-07-18 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tucker Taft @ 1997-07-18 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Tom Moran (tmoran@bix.com) wrote:
: This test program assigns the 'controlled' result from a function
: to a variable. Two compilers create an intermediate anonymous object
: and copy and adjust to it before copying and adjusting to the final
: result. The third compiler does only the final adjust. Is this
: legal according to 7.6(21)?
Yes, it does seem to be legal, provided that the type
does not have aliased subcomponents. Declaring the object as
a whole as aliased does not inhibit the 7.6(21) optimizations; only
the presence of aliased subcomponents does that.
: ... Making the component 'id' aliased does
: not change the behavior.
If a controlled object has an aliased subcomponent, then it should
not be moved without being re-adjusted. However, int the
code that follows, you have made the object as a whole
aliased, but you did not declare the component "id" aliased.
Have you tried this with "aliased" on the declaration of "id"
itself, as opposed to on the declaration of the object "newborn"?
It is certainly the case that this compiler is moving the
object newborn to a new location (from 5897016 to 4587648)
without re-adjusting it, but that is permitted since it has
no aliased subcomponents.
However, if you try this again and you add the word "aliased"
to the declaration of the "id" component, then you should
see different behavior, or else the compiler would be violating
the last sentence of 7.6(21).
: ... The result is that the anonymous object
: is eventually Finalized without ever having been Initialized or
: Adjusted,
: with sad results for my program. Is this a bug in the third compiler,
: or a legal (though unfortunate) possibility?
This is not a bug, unless you have tried this with "aliased" in the
component declaration for "id".
By the way, why are the results "sad" for your program? It may be
that what you are doing is generally not portable. However,
by declaring one of the components as aliased, you perhaps can
make it portable (presuming the compiler properly honors the
last sentence of 7.6(21)).
Alternatively, you might want to change the way you are using
the various Initialize/Adjust/Finalize operations. In particular,
remember that "Initialize" is only used for default initialization
(it might better have been called "Default_Initialize"), and that
an aggregate is a way of constructing a controlled object that
doesn't result in either a call on (default) Initialize or Adjust
for the whole object. (One reason why controlled types should
always be private, is that you want to be sure that aggregates
are only used inside the definition of the controlled
abstraction.)
: with ada.finalization;
: package testc is
: type c_type is new ada.finalization.controlled with record
: id:integer:=0;
: end record;
: function create return c_type;
: procedure initialize(x:in out c_type);
: procedure adjust (x:in out c_type);
: procedure finalize (x:in out c_type);
: end testc;
: with ada.text_io;
: with ada.unchecked_conversion;
: package body testc is
: type a is access all c_type;
: function showa is new ada.unchecked_conversion(a,long_integer);
: function create return c_type is
: newborn:aliased c_type;
: begin
: ada.text_io.put_line("creating" & integer'image(newborn.id) &
: long_integer'image(showa(newborn'unchecked_access)));
: newborn.id:=7;
: return newborn;
: end create;
: count:natural:=0;
: procedure initialize(x:in out c_type) is
: begin
: count:=count+1;x.id:=count;
: ada.text_io.put_line("init"
: & integer'image(x.id) &
: long_integer'image(showa(x'unchecked_access)));
: end initialize;
: procedure adjust (x:in out c_type) is
: begin
: ada.text_io.put_line("adj"
: & integer'image(x.id) &
: long_integer'image(showa(x'unchecked_access)));
: end adjust;
: procedure finalize(x:in out c_type) is
: begin
: ada.text_io.put_line("fin"
: & integer'image(x.id) &
: long_integer'image(showa(x'unchecked_access)));
: end finalize;
: end testc;
: with ada.text_io,testc;
: procedure test is
: procedure try is
: my_c:testc.c_type;
: begin
: ada.text_io.put_line("set");
: my_c:=testc.create;
: ada.text_io.put_line("did it");
: end try;
: begin
: ada.text_io.put_line("start");
: try;
: ada.text_io.put_line("done");
: end test;
: two compilers questionable compiler
: start start
: init 1 39318880 init 1 5897228
: set set
: init 2 39318744 init 2 5897016
: creating 2 39318744 creating 2 5897016
: adj 7 73084948 fin 1 5897228
: fin 7 39318744 adj 7 5897228
: fin 1 39318880 fin 7 4587648
: adj 7 39318880 did it
: fin 7 73084948 fin 7 5897228
: did it done
: fin 7 39318880
: done
--
-Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com http://www.inmet.com/~stt/
Intermetrics, Inc. Burlington, MA USA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread