From: Ken Garlington <keg0@flash.net>
Subject: Re: RTSA vs. OO approach to RTE design
Date: 1997/07/12
Date: 1997-07-12T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33C83A29.A7C@flash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01bc8f26$1daae700$16a9f5cd@asip120
Paul Van Bellinghen wrote:
>
> My company has been using the principles of Real-Time Structured Analysis
> to design the software for its real-time embedded systems for several years
> (we use Cadre Teamwork with Rational Apex Ada (83) - cross compiled with
> VADScross). They (primarily our SW engineering manager) claim that they
> have nothing against an object oriented approach but that none of their SW
> engineers are trained in applying its principles to an actual system
> design. Not being all that knowledgeable in OO design myself, I was
> wondering if anyone is familiar with both approaches to requirements
> design/implementation and can give an opinion as to which approach is
> better for RT embedded systems?
Keep in mind there is a third option: use RTSA for requirements and an
obejct-based approach for design. The Software Productivity Consortium's
ADARTS methodology (which has been used on multiple 1MSLOC+ real-time
projects) is one such example which is targeted to use with Ada 83. SPC
provides extensive training and support. (Some Lockheed Martin companies
are members of the SPC).
>
> --
> Paul Van Bellinghen
> Staff Analyst
> Lockheed Martin Fairchild
> pvanbell@mhv.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-07-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-07-13 0:00 RTSA vs. OO approach to RTE design Paul Van Bellinghen
1997-07-12 0:00 ` Ken Garlington [this message]
1997-07-13 0:00 ` Re : " Laurentau
1997-07-18 0:00 ` Joseph Wisniewski
1997-07-14 0:00 ` Anonymous
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox