From: Steve O'Neill <"x0955$"@mailgw.sanders.lockheed.com>
Subject: Re: MVME177 CPU Utilization
Date: 1997/07/10
Date: 1997-07-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33C56321.42D0@mailgw.sanders.lockheed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 33C4D576.2ACD@admin.tc.faa.gov
Ron Thompson wrote:
> In order to measure CPU Utilization, it is proposed that the figures
> for two 177s, two that are blissfully unaware of one another, be
> averaged together in order to meet required overhead reserves.
> Any opinions??? The email is fine for responses if you care to, and
> Thank You all.
> --
>
> rct
>
> The opinions above are mine and mine alone.
That's not a valid measure of system reserves. Unless, of course, one
processor can borrow time from the other or allocate any overload work
to the other processor. My approach would be to take the worst case
loading of the two processors.
Of course this is only my opinion.
Steve O'Neill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-07-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-07-10 0:00 MVME177 CPU Utilization Ron Thompson
1997-07-10 0:00 ` Steve O'Neill [this message]
1997-07-13 0:00 ` Markus Nickels
1997-07-14 0:00 ` Ron Thompson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox