From: Tom Moran <tmoran@bix.com>
Subject: Re: Shared Generic Instance Code
Date: 1997/04/05
Date: 1997-04-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3346F7E8.78E6@bix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.860206721@merv
> design choice that favors efficiency over space
Though I haven't done a lot of timing studies, I have the distinct
impression that big generics can *drastically* slow down compilation
(Gnat 3.04a NT/95). I presume the macro is essentially expanded and
recompiled each time it's instantiated?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-04-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-04-01 0:00 Shared Generic Instance Code david scott gibson
1997-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-05 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1997-04-05 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-04-05 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1997-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-01 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1997-04-01 0:00 ` Joel VanLaven
1997-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-04-02 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-04-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-03 0:00 ` Bill Keen
1997-04-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-04 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1997-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-04 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-04-03 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1997-04-03 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-04-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-04 0:00 ` Bill Keen
1997-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-04-05 0:00 ` Tom Moran [this message]
1997-04-06 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1997-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox