Re: Tasking newbee

Re: Tasking newbee

[Richard Toy]

Sebastien Pochic wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
>  could someone explain what I should do so that the small tasks (without
> the loop) will end before the "big" task (with the loop), in my example
> it first counts the loop before even beginning the other tasks..
> here's my example:
> 

SNIP

Read the LRM more carefully ;-) especially 9.5.2

The behaviour you are experiencing is correct.

-- 

Regards

Richard Toy

Work: rtoy@dra.hmg.gb
Home: richtoy@pluto.win-uk.net

Tasking newbee

[Sebastien Pochic]

hi,

 could someone explain what I should do so that the small tasks (without
the loop) will end before the "big" task (with the loop), in my example
it first counts the loop before even beginning the other tasks..
here's my example:

with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;



procedure Tasking is

  task First_Task is

    entry Hello;

    entry Hi;

  end First_Task;



  task body First_Task is

  begin

    loop

      select

        accept Hello do

          for i in 1..1000000 loop

            null;

          end loop;

          put("Hello! I'm task #1");

          new_line;

        end Hello;

      or

        accept Hi do

          put("Hi, I'm task #1");

          new_line;

        end Hi;

      end select;

    end loop;

  end First_Task;



  task Second_Task is

    entry Hello;

    entry Hi;

  end Second_Task;



  task body Second_Task is

  begin

    loop

      select

        accept Hello do

          put("Hello! I'm task #2");

          new_line;

        end Hello;

      or

        accept Hi do

          put("Hi, I'm task #2");

          new_line;

        end Hi;

      end select;

    end loop;

  end Second_Task;



begin

  First_Task.Hello;

  First_Task.Hi;

  Second_Task.Hello;

  Second_Task.Hi;

end Tasking;


thanks,

-- sebastien


                 \/||/
                 (o o)
-------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------
Sebastien POCHIC
Computer Science (FSA) - ULB - Brussels
mailto:spochic@INnet.be
----------------------Oooo-------------
              oooO    (   ) 
              (   )    ) /  
               \ (    (_/
                \_)

Re: Tasking newbee

[john schneider]

Sebastien Pochic wrote:

[snip]
>   task body First_Task is
>   begin
>     loop
>       select
>         accept Hello do
>           for i in 1..1000000 loop
>             null;
>           end loop;
>           put("Hello! I'm task #1");
>           new_line;
>         end Hello;
>       or
>         accept Hi do
>           put("Hi, I'm task #1");
>           new_line;
>         end Hi;
>       end select;
>     end loop;
>   end First_Task;
> 
[snip]

The structure of entry points REQUIRES just what it is that you
are asking to avoid.  Re-read your textbooks/LRM regarding the
behavior of tasks and rendesvous.  Any code within the entry
(between do... and  ...end) MUST BE completed before either the
caller or "acceptor" can continue, so the loop has to be allowed to
count before your main routine ever gets a chance to make the other
calls.

Try structuring your task(s) like this:

  task body First_Task is
  begin
    loop
      select
        accept Hello;
        for i in 1..1000000 loop
          null;
        end loop;
        put("Hello! I'm task #1");
        new_line;
      or
        accept Hi;
        put("Hi, I'm task #1");
        new_line;
      or            -- It's amazing how long a program
        terminate;  -- can continue to run without this!!
      end select;
    end loop;
  end First_Task;

Of course, this might not accomplish what you want, either, because
all of your tasks are running at the same priority and the rules
don't require the run-time to make any fancy choices between tasks
eligible to run at the same priority.  Again -- head for the LRM.

One last warning -- Depending on your compiler, using multiple
tasks to perform serial output to the same file (especially to
the console screen) may have less-than-predictable results.

Now that I've given you more problems than answers ... enjoy
the rest of your day.

John Schneider
j-schneider@ti.com

The opinions are mine, but you are welcome to share them.

Re: Tasking newbee

[elaine.waybright]

On Tue, 01 Apr 1997 17:24:08 +0200, Sebastien Pochic
<spochic@INnet.be> wrote:

>hi,
>
> could someone explain what I should do so that the small tasks (without
>the loop) will end before the "big" task (with the loop), in my example
>it first counts the loop before even beginning the other tasks..
>here's my example:
>
>
"Extended rendezvous" (accept .. do ... end) should only be used if
the caller and callee have to be synchronized during the entire
rendezvous. Typically, this is the case if the callee protects some
shared resource that the caller wants to access.

In your case, you want the caller to trigger First_Task to start its
computation and then go back to its business of starting the other
task(s). In that case, you should use the simple rendezvous;
accept .. ; for i in .. loop etc. That is, the lengthy computation is
removed from the rendezvous and executed immediately after by the
callee.

Bo Sanden

Professor Bo Sanden
Colorado Technical University
Colorado Springs

Author of Software Systems Construction with Examples in Ada
(Prentice-Hall)