From: William Dale Jr <William.Dale.Jr@lmco.com>
Subject: AQS95 floatin point relational tests
Date: 1997/03/10
Date: 1997-03-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33241A3A.191B@lmco.com> (raw)
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> Phil Thornely quite reasonably questions the recommendations in AQ&S with
> respect to floating-point comparisons. We have already had an extended
> CLA thread on this topic, and the conclusion was that the AQ&S recommendations
> here are badly flawed and should be ignored.
Do you mean that the guidline is flawed or that the language is flawed?
Is there a FAQ on this issue I can read offline?
--
================================
William L. Dale
n2rhv@amsat.org (home-pageless)
================================
next reply other threads:[~1997-03-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-03-10 0:00 William Dale Jr [this message]
1997-03-11 0:00 ` AQS95 floatin point relational tests Robert Dewar
1997-03-12 0:00 ` JP Thornley
1997-03-13 0:00 ` David Wheeler
[not found] ` <332691DA.59C6@lmco.com>
1997-03-13 0:00 ` JP Thornley
1997-03-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox