From: Matthew Daniel <mdani@ccgate.hac.com>
Subject: Re: syntax completion - a bad thing?
Date: 1997/02/12
Date: 1997-02-12T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <330231C7.4D3D@ccgate.hac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 32FF06AE.190F@rational.com
Greg Bek wrote:
>
> Andrew Kelly wrote:
> >
> >...
blah blah
>
> I wouldn't trade my Apex Ada editor for any other option,
> the ability to browse definitions, perform show_usage and
> auto formatting and syntax completion, along with 25 levels
> of undo make it my editor of choice for Ada. For me it
> is the appropriate tool. As Jerome D wrote is his response
> there are ways to disable the behaviour if you want to.
>
Xemacs with Adamode compiling with GNAT (which is a validated compiler),
you just about covered it all and not at $25K a seat. You do not loose
the ability to edit code whilst doing a semantize on other packages, it
does not use 5 meg of mem per server (directory, editor, etc .. 6) per
person.
I thought the R1000's were great (we only had 7 users at a time on each
machine), RXI as an interface was quick.
Matt
with Disclaimer; use Disclaimer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-02-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <32F91629.5F9@vsl.com.au>
1997-02-10 0:00 ` syntax completion - a bad thing? Lance Kibblewhite
1997-02-10 0:00 ` Greg Bek
1997-02-11 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-02-12 0:00 ` Matthew Daniel [this message]
[not found] ` <dewar.855234467@merv>
[not found] ` <32fa1450.32791176@news.logica.co.uk>
1997-02-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-02-11 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox