From: Michael Chapman <mchapman@hl.siemens.de>
Subject: Re: Help you C++ Debuggers!
Date: 1997/01/22
Date: 1997-01-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32E6DEDA.7386@hl.siemens.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1997Jan20.144447.5581@news
Chris Engebretson wrote:
[snip]
> On the other hand, if you write
>
> char array[8 * 1024 * 1024];
>
> you may very well run into problems, depending on the definition
> of size_t. Since declaring an automatic array of this size is
> completely ridiculous, though, I'd hardly consider this a fault.
>
This is not at all ridiculous.
I have had good reasons in the past to declare considerably bigger
automatic arrays.
The above after all only uses up 23 of your 64 address bits if you
are on a real machine ;-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-01-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-01-16 0:00 Help you C++ Debuggers! Macarthur Drake
1997-01-19 0:00 ` Tore Lund
[not found] ` <32E4EC1B.748E@acm.org>
1997-01-23 0:00 ` Tansel Ersavas
1997-01-23 0:00 ` Danette & Murray Root
1997-01-23 0:00 ` Tansel Ersavas
[not found] ` <01bc093e$9992fa60$966d6f9e@Defualt.DVRD.CDC.GOV>
1997-01-24 0:00 ` Tore Lund
1997-01-25 0:00 ` Lawrence Kirby
1997-01-20 0:00 ` Gautier
1997-01-20 0:00 ` Tanmoy Bhattacharya
1997-01-21 0:00 ` David Emery
1997-01-21 0:00 ` Chris Engebretson
1997-01-21 0:00 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen FOU.TD/DELAB
1997-01-21 0:00 ` Bradley A. Burns
1997-01-21 0:00 ` Chris Engebretson
1997-01-22 0:00 ` David Emery
1997-01-22 0:00 ` Michael Chapman [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox