From: Ken Garlington <GarlingtonKE@lmtas.lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Question about record rep spec placement
Date: 1997/01/18
Date: 1997-01-18T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32E11C0E.697B@lmtas.lmco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E47s35.59o@world.std.com
Robert A Duff wrote:
>
> By and large, the Ada 95 rules are *more*
> permissive than the Ada 83 rules.
>
Oh, I thought you were saying you saw many cases where Ada was _less_
permissive than Ada83, causing upward incompatibilities.
> It's happened to me more than once. But it doesn't happen a LOT.
Then a style rule suggesting the placement of rep specs in the private
area shouldn't usually cause problems, and where it does, a comment
should suffice.
>
> - Bob
--
LMTAS - The Fighter Enterprise - "Our Brand Means Quality"
For job listings, other info: http://www.lmtas.com or
http://www.lmco.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-01-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-01-15 0:00 Question about record rep spec placement Ken Garlington
1997-01-15 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1997-01-16 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-01-17 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-01-18 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-01-15 0:00 ` Bob Gilbert
1997-01-16 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1997-01-17 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-01-17 0:00 ` Bob Gilbert
1997-01-17 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-01-17 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-01-18 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-01-18 0:00 ` Ken Garlington [this message]
1997-01-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-01-21 0:00 ` Bob Gilbert
1997-01-22 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-01-23 0:00 ` Art Schwarz
1997-01-25 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-01-24 0:00 ` Bob Gilbert
1997-01-25 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-01-20 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-01-16 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
1997-01-16 0:00 ` Jerome Desquilbet
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox