From: Mark Smith <mark@ssd.neca.nec.com.au>
Subject: Case Tools for OO (was Re: What is wrong with OO ?)
Date: 1997/01/03
Date: 1997-01-03T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32CC40F6.1FBC@ssd.neca.nec.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5afsto$g92@nntp.interaccess.com
> rmartin@oma.com (Robert C. Martin) wrote:
>
> >In article <32C88BE0.7F2B@acm.org>, i.joyner@acm.org wrote:
>
> >This is undoubtedly true. As engineers we need a CAE system that combines
> >the CASE tool, editor, compiler, documentation tool, debugger, test plan
> >generator, simulator, etc into a single seamless facility. We should be
> >able to browse through our design diagrams, focusing into certain points,
> >double clicking on an adornment or icon to bring up a stretch of "source code"
> >which we could edit. Then build and debug in the same environment.
I will probably get flamed for doing this, but we are beginning to use
Rational ROSE/C++,
and I _like_ it. If you buy Apex, ROSE, and SoDA, you get the case tool,
editor, compiler, documentation,debugger all in one. The test plan
generator could be wangled from SoDA & use cases. The browse through
diagrams, double click to code works.
And it's SOOOO quick for doing design scratchings.
However, you need to put a fairly disciplined process around it. We've
had problems with
multiple solutions to the one problem, and how to combine them all into
the 'repository' model. It's a process thing, not a tool thing
necessarily.
It also does change management, which is very impressive.
>
> >Such a system maintain traceability between requirements, use cases, design
> >artifacts and modules. It would maintain lists of programmer and analysts
Ah, ok. Traceability is a process thing with 3.0.6. I don't know about
4.0.
> >notes that were germane to each other. It would facilitate communcations
> >between engineers working on the project regardless of their location. It would
> >facilitate configuration management and version control. It would facilitat
> >project management.
I don't think so email, and ( erk) MS-Project?
>
> >No such tool exists today. I think it will be a long time before such
> >a tool does exist. But I can dream.
>
Give it a try...
Anybody else got comments?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-01-03 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-12-31 0:00 What is wrong with OO ? Ell
1996-12-31 0:00 ` Nigel Tzeng
1996-12-31 0:00 ` Ian Joyner
1996-12-31 0:00 ` Robert C. Martin
1997-01-01 0:00 ` Tom Bushell
1997-01-02 0:00 ` Thaddeus L. Olczyk
1997-01-03 0:00 ` Mark Smith [this message]
1997-01-03 0:00 ` APEX - WAS: Case Tools for OO (was Re: What is wrong with OO ?) Nigel Tzeng
1997-01-03 0:00 ` Software Development Environments (Was: " Stephen Riehm
1997-01-03 0:00 ` Nigel Tzeng
1997-01-04 0:00 ` "Paul E. Bennett"
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Tom Bushell
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Key Abstraction that is coming Mark Smith
1997-01-06 0:00 ` John Howard
1997-01-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Software Development Environments (Was: What is wrong with OO ?) drush
1997-01-06 0:00 ` drush
1997-01-07 0:00 ` What is wrong with OO ? drush
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox