* Re: FW: "ADA and BEYOND"
@ 1997-03-14 0:00 Jay Joss
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jay Joss @ 1997-03-14 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
And Amen. Regards, Jay
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: FW: "ADA and BEYOND"
Author: Alfred M Selgas at SPAWAR-MC1
Date: 3/14/97 10:19 AM
FYI,
HALLELUJAH.
R/AL SELGAS
>From: Paige, Emmett Jr., , OSD/C3I +
>To: Jones, Anita, Dr, OUSD/AT 001; Kaminski, Paul, Mr, OUSD/AT001;
>Longuemare, Noel, Mr, OUSD/001
>Cc: Brown, Linda, , OSD/C3I; Rand, Cynthia, , OSD/C3I +; Soos, James,
>Dr., OSD/C3I +; Dempsey, Joan, CIV, OSD/C3I +; Castor, Virginia,
>Ms,OUSD/AT; 'Decker Gil,ASSTSEC. ARMY RDA'; 'Douglass John,ASST.
>SECNAV'; Edmonds, Albert LtGen; Gauss John A. RADM. JIEO DISA; Hamilton
>John, LTC; 'Kelley David MG DISA'; 'Money Art., ASST.SECAF. RDA'
>Subject: "ADA and BEYOND"
>Date: Thursday, February 27, 1997 10:03AM
>
>AS YOU KNOW WE HAD THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES,NATIONAL RESEARCH
>COUNCIL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOARD PERFORM A STUDY OF
>OUR SOFTWARE POLICIES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
> HOPEFULLY YOU HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON THE RESULTS OF THAT STUDY AND
>POSSIBLY READ AND REREAD THE PUBLISHED REPORT AS I HAVE.
>THE STUDY IS A GOOD ONE AND I AM PREPARED TO ACCEPT AND IMPLEMENT ALL OF
>THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS WITH ONE EXCEPTION.
>I BELIEVE DOD SHOULD NO LONGER REQUIRE ADA FOR ANY OF ITS SYSTEMS BUT
>CONTINUE TO SUPPORT IT AS THE PREFERRED LANGUAGE,PARTCULARLY FOR OUR
>WEAPON SYSTEMS AND C4ISR SYSTEMS. BY DOING THIS WE WILL TAKE THE LONE
>CONTENTIOUS POINT OF RESENTMENT OUT OF THE DOD SOFTWARE PROCESS , BUT
>WITH THE OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS SUCH AS THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SOFTWARE
>ENGINEERING PLAN, I BELIEVE WE WILL GET THE DESIRED RESULTS WITHOUT
>MANDATING ANY PARTICULAR PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE.
>I WILL HAVE THE STAFF BEGIN THE ACTION TO PREPARE THE PROPOSED DOD
>SOFTWARE POLICY AS REFLECTED IN APPENDIX A, WHICH BEGINS ON PAGE 75 OF
>THE STUDY REPORT, AND AMEND IT AS STATED ABOVE TO REMOVE THEIR PROPOSED
>MANDATE FOR WARFIGHTING SYSTEMS.
>WE WILL PREPARE THE POLICY DIRECTIVE FOR SIGNATURE BY BOTH DR KAMINSKI
>AND ME. WILL GET THIS ONE ON A FAST TRACK.
>WOULD APPRECISATE ANY COMMENTS OR REACTIONS FROM THIS PROPOSAL FROM ANY
>ADDRESSEES.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* FW: "ADA and BEYOND"
@ 1997-03-14 0:00 Alfred M Selgas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alfred M Selgas @ 1997-03-14 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
FYI,
HALLELUJAH.
R/AL SELGAS
>From: Paige, Emmett Jr., , OSD/C3I +
>To: Jones, Anita, Dr, OUSD/AT 001; Kaminski, Paul, Mr, OUSD/AT001;
>Longuemare, Noel, Mr, OUSD/001
>Cc: Brown, Linda, , OSD/C3I; Rand, Cynthia, , OSD/C3I +; Soos, James,
>Dr., OSD/C3I +; Dempsey, Joan, CIV, OSD/C3I +; Castor, Virginia,
>Ms,OUSD/AT; 'Decker Gil,ASSTSEC. ARMY RDA'; 'Douglass John,ASST.
>SECNAV'; Edmonds, Albert LtGen; Gauss John A. RADM. JIEO DISA; Hamilton
>John, LTC; 'Kelley David MG DISA'; 'Money Art., ASST.SECAF. RDA'
>Subject: "ADA and BEYOND"
>Date: Thursday, February 27, 1997 10:03AM
>
>AS YOU KNOW WE HAD THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES,NATIONAL RESEARCH
>COUNCIL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOARD PERFORM A STUDY OF
>OUR SOFTWARE POLICIES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.
> HOPEFULLY YOU HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON THE RESULTS OF THAT STUDY AND
>POSSIBLY READ AND REREAD THE PUBLISHED REPORT AS I HAVE.
>THE STUDY IS A GOOD ONE AND I AM PREPARED TO ACCEPT AND IMPLEMENT ALL OF
>THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS WITH ONE EXCEPTION.
>I BELIEVE DOD SHOULD NO LONGER REQUIRE ADA FOR ANY OF ITS SYSTEMS BUT
>CONTINUE TO SUPPORT IT AS THE PREFERRED LANGUAGE,PARTCULARLY FOR OUR
>WEAPON SYSTEMS AND C4ISR SYSTEMS. BY DOING THIS WE WILL TAKE THE LONE
>CONTENTIOUS POINT OF RESENTMENT OUT OF THE DOD SOFTWARE PROCESS , BUT
>WITH THE OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS SUCH AS THE REQUIREMENT FOR A SOFTWARE
>ENGINEERING PLAN, I BELIEVE WE WILL GET THE DESIRED RESULTS WITHOUT
>MANDATING ANY PARTICULAR PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE.
>I WILL HAVE THE STAFF BEGIN THE ACTION TO PREPARE THE PROPOSED DOD
>SOFTWARE POLICY AS REFLECTED IN APPENDIX A, WHICH BEGINS ON PAGE 75 OF
>THE STUDY REPORT, AND AMEND IT AS STATED ABOVE TO REMOVE THEIR PROPOSED
>MANDATE FOR WARFIGHTING SYSTEMS.
>WE WILL PREPARE THE POLICY DIRECTIVE FOR SIGNATURE BY BOTH DR KAMINSKI
>AND ME. WILL GET THIS ONE ON A FAST TRACK.
>WOULD APPRECISATE ANY COMMENTS OR REACTIONS FROM THIS PROPOSAL FROM ANY
>ADDRESSEES.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-03-14 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-03-14 0:00 FW: "ADA and BEYOND" Jay Joss
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-03-14 0:00 Alfred M Selgas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox