From: Jonas Nygren <ehsjony@ehs.ericsson.se>
Subject: Re: Experiment Proposal re Languages
Date: 1996/10/24
Date: 1996-10-24T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <326F5E48.5FBA@ehs.ericsson.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 32702431.DE6@dynamite.com.au
I believe I saw something similar, to what Alan describes below,
in the comp.lang.functional some year(s) ago. I can't remember what
languages were included in the excersise more than C and some
functional language. The C code was never completed I believe and
the functional language, perhaps Haskell, were the most efficient
in terms of man hours spent and lines of code needed.
Perhaps somebody else have a reference to this experiment?
/jonas
Alan Brain wrote:
>
> Re Language Wars.
>
> It's my contention that not all languages are created equal. That some
> have definite advantages over others, all other things being equal. For
> example, and to be non-contraversial, programming in binary is likely to
> be less productive than in C, in general. And a language specifically
> tailored to a problem domain is likely to be better than any
> general-purpose language.
>
> So I'd like to try an experiment.
<snip>
>
> ---------------------- <> <> How doth the little Crocodile
> | Alan & Carmel Brain| xxxxx Improve his shining tail?
> | Canberra Australia | xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
> ---------------------- o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo oo oo oo
> By pulling Maerklin Wagons, in 1/220 Scale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-10-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-10-24 0:00 Experiment Proposal re Languages Alan Brain
1996-10-24 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-10-24 0:00 ` Jonas Nygren [this message]
1996-10-24 0:00 ` Franklin Chen
1996-10-26 0:00 ` Michiel Perdeck
1996-10-26 0:00 ` Mark Eichin
1996-10-26 0:00 ` Michiel Perdeck
1996-10-28 0:00 ` Matthew M. Lih
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox