Re: Asynchronous Transfer of Control

[James Squire <m193884@csehp1.mdc.com>]

Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> iJames asks
> 
> "I reported it to the compiler vendor, and they pointed out to me from the
> AARM (9.8) that I didn't have an abort completion point in my abortable
> part.  I looked at the list of things that qualify, and sure enough I
> don't.
> 
> Unless I am barking up the wrong tree or something, I really don't
> understand this limitation.  Is this yet another example of an invalid
> code sample in the Rationale?"
> 
> The rationale simply assumes you have immediate abort, if not this code
> obviously will not work.

Eh????  What do you mean by immediate abort and what do you mean by 
"having" it?

I'm confused.
-- 
James Squire                             mailto:m193884@csehp1.mdc.com
MDA Avionics Tools & Processes
McDonnell Douglas Aerospace              http://www.mdc.com/
Opinions expressed here are my own and NOT my company's
"Strange. I wonder why he appeared just to you [Londo], Draal and the
    Commander."
'Perhaps because we are most familiar with the third principle of 
sentient
    life."
	-- Delenn and Draal, "A Voice in the Wilderness II"