Re: Garbage Collection in Ada

[Tapani Rundgren <Tapani.Rundgren@ein.ericsson.se>]

Laurent Pautet wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Jon" == Jon S Anthony <jsa@alexandria> writes:
> Jon> payback".  I am clearly not wrong in claiming Orbix/Ada offers
> Jon> functionally everything (and more) than the Distributed System Annex.
Don't agree!
> 
> Yes ? Is it obvious in a client code to handle an exception (print the
> exception message) that has not been declared in a server spec ? Is it
> obvious to ensure remote asynchronous transfert control in CORBA ? How
> do you implement share data (matrix and slices) ? And atomic
> operations on these data ?  These are of course examples but it is
> very easy to find features that are impossible or complex to write
> with CORBA (even remote object features) and that are very easy with
> Annex E. Of course, you will be able to implement complex features
> with CORBA, but you're going to write everything with some kind of
> message passing (or asynchronous RPCs) when DSA would provide exactly
> what you are looking for.
> 
> Of course, it could be very interesting to implement DSA on the top of
> CORBA because in some respects, "<DSA> offers functionally everything
> (and more) than <CORBA>" :-)

Ten points, thanks Laurent!!!!!

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
| Tapani Rundgren     Email: Tapani.Rundgren@ein.ericsson.se|
| Bj�rkv�gen 14       Work:  +46 54 29 44 89                |
| S-663 41 Hammar�    Home:  +46 54 52 25 02                |
-------------------------------------------------------------