* Re: Future of the mandate to use Ada
[not found] <01bbb178$d30c2140$72663389@billn.logicon.com>
@ 1996-10-07 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ken Garlington @ 1996-10-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Bill Nielsen wrote:
>
> Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force Lloyd Mosemann, II
> writes in the preface to Guidelines for Successful Acquisition and
> Management of Software-Intensive Systems (June 1996): "... as DoD moves
> from mandating Ada to preferring Ada (the first choice is good, existing
> COTS) ...".
>
> This statement, coupled with the fact that for the past two years I have
> been aware of several DoD programs using C++ instead of Ada, leads me to
> wonder if DoD is being more liberal in granting waivers and is considering
> removing or relaxing the Ada mandate, which I understand is still in
> effect.
The statement reflects current DoD direction, as described in the 5000 series
of directives (recently released). It is also consistent with the _old_ DoD
policy, which did not require Ada for COTS. The 5000 series defines when waivers
should be granted.
>
> Thank you in advance for any information you have that clarifies this
> issue.
>
> Bill Nielsen
> bnielsen@logicon.com
--
LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"
For more info, see http://www.lmtas.com or http://www.lmco.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread