comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Future of the mandate to use Ada
       [not found] <01bbb178$d30c2140$72663389@billn.logicon.com>
@ 1996-10-07  0:00 ` Ken Garlington
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ken Garlington @ 1996-10-07  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)



Bill Nielsen wrote:
> 
> Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force Lloyd Mosemann, II
> writes in the preface to Guidelines for Successful Acquisition and
> Management of Software-Intensive Systems (June 1996): "... as DoD moves
> from mandating Ada to preferring Ada (the first choice is good, existing
> COTS) ...".
> 
> This statement, coupled with the fact that for the past two years I have
> been aware of several DoD programs using C++ instead of Ada, leads me to
> wonder if DoD is being more liberal in granting waivers and is considering
> removing or relaxing the Ada mandate, which I understand is still in
> effect.

The statement reflects current DoD direction, as described in the 5000 series
of directives (recently released). It is also consistent with the _old_ DoD
policy, which did not require Ada for COTS. The 5000 series defines when waivers
should be granted.

> 
> Thank you in advance for any information you have that clarifies this
> issue.
> 
> Bill Nielsen
> bnielsen@logicon.com

-- 
LMTAS - "Our Brand Means Quality"
For more info, see http://www.lmtas.com or http://www.lmco.com




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~1996-10-07  0:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <01bbb178$d30c2140$72663389@billn.logicon.com>
1996-10-07  0:00 ` Future of the mandate to use Ada Ken Garlington

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox