From: Stanley Allen <sallen@ghgcorp.com>
Subject: Re: Executable File Size Differences
Date: 1996/10/03
Date: 1996-10-03T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32548F78.5D64@ghgcorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DyLoy8.C0u@thomsoft.com
Ken Cowan (Thompson):
> Both Visual C++ and ObjectAda for Windows have a smart linker. If you
> have a source file containing hundreds of subprograms but only call
> one of them, then only that one gets included into the image.
>
Hurray!!!! I'm happy to be corrected in this way.
Now, is anyone going to publish Ada95 compiler comparisons?
Peter Coffee wrote an article for this week's PC Week (Sept. 30)
touting ObjectAda, with *actual performance figures!*
Gentlemen, start your engines...
Stanley Allen
sallen@ghgcorp.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-10-03 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-09-25 0:00 Executable File Size Differences Robert P. Kuzmicki
1996-09-25 0:00 ` Georgi Savov
1996-09-28 0:00 ` Stanley Allen
1996-09-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-30 0:00 ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1996-10-01 0:00 ` Ken Cowan
1996-10-03 0:00 ` Stanley Allen [this message]
1996-10-04 0:00 ` Ada 95 - Performance vs. Pervasiveness (was: Executable File Size Diff Larry Kilgallen
1996-10-02 0:00 ` Executable File Size Differences Robert I. Eachus
1996-10-06 0:00 ` John Howard
1996-09-28 0:00 ` Simon FitzMaurice
1996-10-02 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-10-11 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-09-28 0:00 Robert Dewar
1996-09-28 0:00 ` Tony Picarello
1996-09-29 0:00 tmoran
1996-09-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox