From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: on the need to duplicate code for procedure signature in both body and interface files
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 03:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-07-09T03:49:39-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <323bd6e4-5b78-4515-8167-985ff03fb1c0@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fab6265b-91f2-41c6-8e96-ad1c1180e1d8@w21g2000yqw.googlegroups.com>
On Monday, July 9, 2012 3:48:09 AM UTC+2, Britt wrote:
> This topic was recently discussed in the "Ada Programming Language"
> LinkedIn group in a thread titled "Imaginary proposal for the next Ada
> standard: Ada compilers will automatically generate Package
> Specification from Package Body". The discussion started as a poll and
> most respondents (including me) strongly dislike the idea.
>
> Edward Colbert just posted a nice summary there.
IMHO, this idea indicates a fundamental ignorance of the basics principles of Ada.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-09 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-07 23:08 on the need to duplicate code for procedure signature in both body and interface files Nasser M. Abbasi
2012-07-08 4:01 ` Shark8
2012-07-08 17:13 ` Brian Drummond
2012-07-08 4:21 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-07-08 6:09 ` Jeffrey Carter
2012-07-13 15:51 ` Robert A Duff
2012-07-08 7:38 ` Stephen Leake
2012-07-08 10:52 ` Manuel Collado
2012-07-09 1:48 ` Britt
2012-07-09 10:49 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2012-07-09 15:11 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-07-13 17:12 ` björn lundin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox