From: Dennison <dennison@iag.net>
Subject: Re: Are there any "bad" Ada constructs?
Date: 1996/09/05
Date: 1996-09-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <322F87B2.6024@iag.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 322E16DC.74B1@swcp.com
Gordon Dodrill wrote:
>
> The C and C++ language have several constructs that are undefined enough
> that two conforming compilers are permitted to give different results and
> still be correct. One example is,
> My question is: Are there any constructs in Ada that are permitted to do
> two or more different things and still be correct, in a manner that
> is similar to that listed above?
In Ada 83, anything defined in the LRM to be "erronious" would fall into
this catagory.
--
email - mailto:dennison@iag.net
homepage - http://www.iag.net/~dennison
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-09-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-09-04 0:00 Are there any "bad" Ada constructs? Gordon Dodrill
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Dennison [this message]
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Jerome Desquilbet
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Peter Amey
1996-09-16 0:00 ` George Haddad
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox