From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: Language Flames
Date: 22 May 91 16:05:21 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3214@sparko.gwu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1991May21.163758.1@east.pima.edu
Once again I'd like to plead for keeping this an Ada group. We are all
entitled to our opinions; mine is that it's not a good place for
language bashing or emotional comparisons between languages.
This is at least the 7th time in the last few years that we've gotten into
a war of words over Ada vs. the C family. I can hit the kill key, but the
poor folks who get Info-Ada digests have to slog through the flames to
read the other digested messages.
Please let's end the emotional stuff, guys. Both Ada and C++ are here to stay;
even-handed comparisons of features might be educational for us all, but this
bashing is just a waste of network bandwidth.
Ted, Jim, Ray: is this OK with you all?
Mike
PS - why don't you guys set up an alt group for language vs. language
free-for-alls? I notice the Lisp proponents are into the act now...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1991-05-22 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1991-05-20 17:20 Language Flames Michael Feldman
1991-05-20 19:15 ` McCook
1991-05-20 20:22 ` Kevin Simonson
1991-05-21 23:37 ` rharwood
1991-05-22 16:05 ` Michael Feldman [this message]
1991-05-23 2:18 ` Jim Showalter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox