From: Joe Colloca <jcolloca@thomsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 Validated on HP
Date: 1996/08/06
Date: 1996-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3206A5DD.3F@thomsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.839077263@schonberg
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> A note on annex terminology
> There are two quite different kinds of annexes in the RM. Some annexes
> are part of the core, and I have not heard the term "core annexe" as in
> the above reply, before, but that is a useful term. All of the annexes
> A,B and J are in this category
[snip]
There had been some discussion on another thread regarding the use of
"Annex" when referring to Annex A and B because they are actually part
of the Core Language.. hence the term "Core Annex", somewhat of an
oxymoron, but... :-)
>Consequently, you really have to look carefully at 2.0
> validations. Some validated compilers passed 100% of the Ada 95 core tests
> and some passed 0%.
[snip]
Absolutely correct - we've been stressing this point as well...ObjectAda
7.x compilers validated under 2.0 or 2.01 pass 100% Ada95 tests.
Optional Annex support is, of course, planned for the 7.x series and
beyond...
Joe Colloca
prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-08-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-07-26 0:00 Ada 95 Validated on HP Joe Colloca
1996-07-30 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-08-02 0:00 ` Joe Colloca
1996-08-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-06 0:00 ` Joe Colloca [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox