From: Joe Gwinn <gwinn@sud.ed.ray.com>
Subject: Re: Ada83 equivalents for Ada95
Date: 1996/05/24
Date: 1996-05-24T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <31A66DAA.7418@sud.ed.ray.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Dr70x4.Drs@world.std.com
We have the Ada83 versus Ada95 problem as well. In short, we plan to
use the Ada83 subset of Ada95, so that in some future, we will be able
to transition to Ada95, should the customer so desire. This will
happen, if at all, long after the present project is complete. We are
avoiding Ada95 for now, because we couldn't find sufficiently mature
compilers, tools, runtimes, for our targets, and Ada83 is sufficient.
If Ada83 is any guide, it will be three years before Ada95 reaches
anything like Ada83's present level of maturity. Ada83 took more like
six years, but started from scratch.
The Ada95 standard defines this Ada83 subset, by what it doesn't mention
as having been broken by Ada95.
Joe Gwinn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-05-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <md5:0CCFC2005521EA8746533FEB9AA03D75>
1996-05-09 0:00 ` Ada83 equivalents for Ada95 James A. Squire
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-05-24 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn [this message]
1996-05-25 0:00 ` JP Thornley
1996-05-28 0:00 ` Brad Balfour
1996-05-28 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-05-29 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-05-29 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-05-17 0:00 ` New POSIX Ada Activity Announcement Shane P. McCarron
1996-05-28 0:00 ` Ada83 equivalents for Ada95 Jon S Anthony
1996-05-29 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-05-31 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-05-10 0:00 tmoran
1996-05-11 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
[not found] <md5:492A761845FE7D43B3C33CDDC6DB8CD0>
1996-05-10 0:00 ` James A. Squire
1996-05-11 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-05-25 0:00 tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox