From: David Botton <david@botton.com>
Subject: Re: GNOGA v1.1 Released - Ada Cloud Desktop and Mobile Development
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2015-07-09T20:46:48-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <318e5fe5-17bb-457c-93ae-4f8d774cce6d@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <592bdded-e693-40d3-a78f-84f4270c8008@googlegroups.com>
> Question: If there's a compiler taking .NET to ASM.js, then would the runtime encumbrance (or anything really) stick with if you processed it? After all, the output of that DOTNET-to-JS would be, at best, a "derivative work".
That is what the license virus does, it makes your work a derivative work and so get the GPL even if you don't want it and even if the FSF never intended it.
> And *IF* the runtime is encumbered, would it be feasible to use the pragma-restrictions to avoid it?
Given the past record of ridiculous claims like "downloading from site X overrides stated licenses" prank or false IP scares, I highly doubt you won't here claim the generated binder file is GPL so that pragma may not be enough. (There is no FSF .NET version).
David Botton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 14:43 GNOGA v1.1 Released - Ada Cloud Desktop and Mobile Development David Botton
2015-07-04 1:58 ` Shark8
2015-07-08 10:08 ` slos
2015-07-08 13:07 ` David Botton
2015-07-10 1:32 ` Shark8
2015-07-10 3:46 ` David Botton [this message]
2015-07-10 15:10 ` slos
2015-07-09 12:11 ` Vincent
2015-07-09 15:53 ` David Botton
2015-07-09 16:16 ` vincent.diemunsch
2015-07-09 18:11 ` David Botton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox